Wednesday, March 09, 2005
And another e-mail
This one has also been edited to remove actual names. I wanted to post it here, though, so anyone who wanders by can see exactly how Ward Churchill's "criticism" of the government is being perceived by his most rabid supporters. My reply to this person is first, while his e-mail is below. I will be posting any replies he sends me here, in a public forum (sans actual names), as well as any replies I may receive to any of my own free speech from Ward Churchill himself.
Hi, Nxxx, I don't know you, but I wonder, would it have been loving to criticize Bill Clinton's presidency? Is it loving to say that "more 9-11s" need to happen? Is it loving to tell a man to his face, as WC did, that his son deserved to die? Do you have kids, Nxxx? What jobs do they hold? Are any of those jobs in the "technocratic" spehere, or are they all gurus and swamis living off the land and selling handmade leis to those tourists whose kneecaps WC wants shot out--in a loving way, of course? Because Nxxx, unless your own children are planning that sort of future, the sort of future wherein they take nothing from the evil American government (including welfare)--then they are also little Nazis who deserve to die. Wow, what a loving dad you must be. I bet holidays are a hoot at your place.
Where do you buy your family gifts, speaking of holidays? Where do you buy your clothes? What kind of car do you drive (bet you anything it's a Volvo or a Beemer, something that screams STATUS)? Because, Nxxx, unless you walk to work every day in clothes your wife made from cotton she picked and spun and sewed herself with thread she somehow also made herself, then you are living off a technocratic society and you are a little Nazi who deserves to die, at least according to this maniac Ward Churchill you defend. After all, he said that ignorance is no excuse. If you profit from a technocratic society (he apparently gets his $90,000 + a year in beans or something, it couldn't possibly be a--gasp!--check he deposits in a--gasp!--bank, now could it? Into an interest-bearing account? And will he reject Social Security checks from the technocratic government he wants destroyed?) then you are a little Nazi who deserves to die.
You know, the image I get when I think of the fact that WC's "loving" criticism of George 43 would involve the "US out of existence altogether, and take Canada with you when you go" is a hideous one, an image of a man in a drug-induced almost sexual daze, quietly and lovingly pulling the trigger. That ain't love, Nxxx, that's anarchy and treason and yes, my friend, hatred.
[Diana Trent]
In a message dated 09-Mar-05 1:37:43 AM Mountain Standard Time, Xxxxxx writes:
In a message dated 3/8/05 10:36:00, nxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx writes
re: Your interest in Ward Churchill, inter alia
Dear Xxx: To criticize the misdirection this country is going to under the misgovernment of George 11 is an act of love not hatred. Too bad you don't get it. Nxxx
Hi, Nxxx, I don't know you, but I wonder, would it have been loving to criticize Bill Clinton's presidency? Is it loving to say that "more 9-11s" need to happen? Is it loving to tell a man to his face, as WC did, that his son deserved to die? Do you have kids, Nxxx? What jobs do they hold? Are any of those jobs in the "technocratic" spehere, or are they all gurus and swamis living off the land and selling handmade leis to those tourists whose kneecaps WC wants shot out--in a loving way, of course? Because Nxxx, unless your own children are planning that sort of future, the sort of future wherein they take nothing from the evil American government (including welfare)--then they are also little Nazis who deserve to die. Wow, what a loving dad you must be. I bet holidays are a hoot at your place.
Where do you buy your family gifts, speaking of holidays? Where do you buy your clothes? What kind of car do you drive (bet you anything it's a Volvo or a Beemer, something that screams STATUS)? Because, Nxxx, unless you walk to work every day in clothes your wife made from cotton she picked and spun and sewed herself with thread she somehow also made herself, then you are living off a technocratic society and you are a little Nazi who deserves to die, at least according to this maniac Ward Churchill you defend. After all, he said that ignorance is no excuse. If you profit from a technocratic society (he apparently gets his $90,000 + a year in beans or something, it couldn't possibly be a--gasp!--check he deposits in a--gasp!--bank, now could it? Into an interest-bearing account? And will he reject Social Security checks from the technocratic government he wants destroyed?) then you are a little Nazi who deserves to die.
You know, the image I get when I think of the fact that WC's "loving" criticism of George 43 would involve the "US out of existence altogether, and take Canada with you when you go" is a hideous one, an image of a man in a drug-induced almost sexual daze, quietly and lovingly pulling the trigger. That ain't love, Nxxx, that's anarchy and treason and yes, my friend, hatred.
[Diana Trent]
In a message dated 09-Mar-05 1:37:43 AM Mountain Standard Time, Xxxxxx writes:
In a message dated 3/8/05 10:36:00, nxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx writes
re: Your interest in Ward Churchill, inter alia
Dear Xxx: To criticize the misdirection this country is going to under the misgovernment of George 11 is an act of love not hatred. Too bad you don't get it. Nxxx
